Beautythatmoves

May 12, 2010

tea

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — richardkemp1980 @ 5:32 am

Used Material from:Organic Rooibos Tea

Mark Williams has a problem.

Williams is chairman of Tea Party Express, a leading organization in the Tea Party movement. The Express is operated by Our Country Deserves Better PAC, which is run out of the offices of Russo Marsh & Rogers, a Republican-affiliated strategy firm. Sal Russo, OCBD's chief strategist, has been a Republican strategist since Ronald Reagan's 1966 gubernatorial campaign. Even though other Tea Party groups consider the Express an Astroturf organzation, implying that it has corporate backers and lacks grass-roots support, it has organized three successful cross-country bus tours to oppose the policies of the Obama administration.

These tours garnered heavy media attention from Fox News and, eventually, CNN, and its most recent tour featured two appearances by Sarah Palin, one of which was dubbed the Conservative Woodstock. Sounds good. So what's the problem?

The problem, according to the rest of the Tea Party movement, is Mark Williams.

Williams has referred to President Obama as a Nazi, a half-white racist, a half-black racist and an Indonesian Muslim turned welfare fraud. In turn, much of the Tea Party movement has referred to Williams as a racist, a bigot, amoral, lacking any semblance of a conscience, deceitful, selfish, conniving, the Michael Steele of the Tea Party and, perhaps worst of all, a liberal.

Williams hasn't done much to help his image. Far from it. In May of 1997, he told an Idaho newspaper that his job in talk radio was “to make people listen so the ad people can charge advertisers a lot of money so I won't have to kill my own food or lift anything heavy.”

The very next month he told the Albany Times Union, “What I do better than most is figure out which way the parade is marching, dash to the front and say, 'Follow me.' Nobody wants to listen to me rant and rave, they want to hear some kind of conflict.”

Williams's career in radio stretches back more than 20 years. According to the New York Times, Williams worked in Arizona in 1987, where he used his radio pulpit to lobby for the recall, impeachment and arraignment of Arizona's Republican Governor Evan Mecham, who was successfully impeached on February 27, 1988. Mecham was the first governor to face impeachment, recall and indictment all at the same time, and also is responsible for eliminating Martin Luther King, Jr. Day as a holiday in Arizona.

In October of 1988, the staff of XTRA-AM in San Diego stumbled across a memo to the staff of rival station KSDO-FM, written to inform them about changes in the XTRA lineup, specifically the addition of one Mark Williams. In a section called 'Dirty Tricks', the memo referred to Williams as “the Donald Segretti of talk radio.” Segretti, a member of Nixon's Committee to Re-Elect the President (CREEP) pled guilty to and served four months in jail for a campaign of dirty tricks. One of these tricks was the forging of a letter from Democratic presidential candidate Edmund Muskie's letterhead falsely alleging that fellow Democratic senator Henry Jackson had an illegitimate child with a 17-year-old. Segretti referred to his techniques as “ratfucking.” The memo quoted an unidentified source from Phoenix, Arizona, where Williams had last worked, claimed Williams was “not extraordinarily bright or talented and capable only of going for the jugular,” with “a very big ego which gets in the way of good taste and judgment on the air.” The memo quotes Bob Christopher, program director of KTAR-AM in Phoenix, as saying, “I'm amazed Williams was able to get a job.”

In 1993 Williams worked at WFLA-AM, where, according to former colleague Jon Grayson, he was the station's token liberal.

“After he got himself fired for going on the air drunk, he apparently got tired of bouncing from station to station while guys who sold out to the Rush Limbaugh clone theory of talk radio were staying put in relatively stable jobs,” said Grayson.

“Now he's set himself up as this Tea Party guru,” Grayson continued. “I wonder how many of his followers know that he's wearing a silver, Wiccan pentagram pendant under that conservative collar and tie. That is, unless he's given that up too as part of his 'transformation'. The Mark Williams I worked with used to spout the liberal agenda and rail (with my help) against the same people he's now leading. That, of course, after a day of smoking dope by the pool at his apartment complex in St. Petersburg. He was, needless to say, a lot cooler back then. This Tea Party act of his is just that — it's an act. Mark Williams believes in one cause: the betterment of Mark Williams. He's a sellout, and not even a particularly good one. He's discovered that it's easy to sell flame-throwing books to drooling right-wingers, and is riding the image all the way to the bank.”

Grayson is currently the host of Overnight America on three CBS radio stations: KMOX-St. Louis, WCCO-Minneapolis/St. Paul and KDKA-Pittsburgh.

Another KFLA colleague, Gabe Hobbs, corroborates Grayson's claim; “Mark Williams worked for me doing an evening talk show on WFLA in Tampa. And yes, he was a liberal.” According to Hobbs, it didn't work out with Williams and he was let go. “I lost track of him until he was hired at KFBK in Sacramento many years later. That station happened to be one of the stations in my division at Jacor (later Clear Channel) and so I was sort of reunited with Mark and lo and behold he was now a conservative. Surprised me but hey, anyone can change their opinions for whatever reasons.” Hobbs went on to work as a senior vice president of programming for Clear Channel Radio and currently runs his own talent management firm, Gabe Hobbs Media.

In 1997, while at WGY-AM in Albany, New York, Williams caused controversy by calling Palestinians “tree-swinging savages.” At the time, Williams described himself to Albany's Times Union as “a fiscal conservative and a social liberal” who supports gay marriage. “Parade magazine did a rundown on where Colin Powell falls on issues and we were lockstep on almost every issue,'' Williams told his local newspaper.

Later however, Williams' changed his views. In a November 9, 2009 exchange, CNN's Anderson Cooper asked Williams “Can't you have a liberal Republican or a moderate Republican?” To which Williams responded, “Liberal by definition is an enemy ideology to this country.”

Also, after Proposition 8 passed in California, revoking the rights of gays to marry, Williams wrote in his blog that California Attorney General Jerry Brown, who promised to fight the proposition, had “tossed his oath into the garbage and in an outright lie he maintained that the Constitution 'protects' the 'rights' of homosexuals to marry.”

Williams also has a tendency to refer to his opponents as “faggots”. For example, on January 27, 2008, Williams wrote that citizens of a Vermont town which was voting on issuing arrest warrants for George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were “genetically defective, circus freak, tiny cranium, hairy-arm-pitted female & faggot alleged male biological train wrecks who totally make the argument for forced Eugenics.” In December of 2007 he called former President Jimmy Carter a “creepy little faggot.”

In a March 3 email, directed at Williams but also sent to a list of leaders of Tea Party Express, Our Country Deserves Better PAC, Move America Forward, Russo Marsh and Freedomworks, former OCBD-PAC Political Director Kelly Eustis tore into Williams for walking off the set in the middle of an interview with Dylan Ratigan on MSNBC:

I've been laughing all day at this. Don't try to turn this as though MSNBC was against you and you had to walk off… clearly you already know what that channel is about. You played it up. Or is because Mark is a friend of Keith Olbermann? A little Bill Clinton connection coming along? Oh-oh! Can't answer a simple question from lame MSNBC host? C'mon… do you, or do you not, allow racists at tea party rallies? A quick answer would be that “they would be asked to leave.” Is that so hard?! Jeez. Grow a set rather than grow a further ego. There are a few crazies at every rally but that means showing that they don't belong. Deal with it… Mark, for future reference, don't put a corny half-assed looking cover of your upcoming book and the Tea Party Express III logo in the background… that's just cheap, and quite frankly made it easy for you to be kicked off. Did you guys make it with Microsoft Paint?

On March 5, 2010 John Ziegler, executive producer of Media Malpractice and one of Williams's former associates sent another email out to the same list of recipients. The author of the email did not mince words. The tirade begins:

You, Mark, are a complete and total fraud, and you are ripping off the Tea Party movement for your own gain while making it look bad to the mainstream in the process. “I don't know if you are indeed a racist (I, like others who know you or have read your blog posts, suspect that you are), but I do know that you are no conservative and you are very bad for the cause. On top of that, you are one of the very worst human beings I have ever encountered.” The author went on to claim, “Mark was a Pro-Clinton, anti-impeachment, anti-military, pro-drug bleeding heart liberal who told lies about and regularly mocked George Bush and the Bush family… Keep in mind, it is Mark's fraudulent politics (I have no idea what his real beliefs are and I don't think he does either) that you should be worried about. It is his completely lack of any semblance of a conscience that should really trouble you. The Mark Williams I know is simply amoral and, especially based on what I have heard from the inside of TPE, he is milking the organization simply for his own personal financial gain and aggrandizement.

Eustis told HuffPost, “Mark Williams is one thing on-stage and on television, but when out of the spotlight he is not the 'conservative Tea Party leader' he's known as on Fox News. He preaches working hard and paying taxes when he hasn't had a real job in years since he was fired from his radio talk show. People like Mark, racist bigots, have infiltrated the movement and are giving it a bad name. Williams went from radio station to radio station — Florida, New York, California, etc. — and was never able to keep his job that long. He hasn't been in radio for many years and only sits in when stations do not have any one else. [OCDB-PAC Coordinator] Joe Wierzbicki continuously gives Mark bonuses for going on television and buys a large amount of books from him in order to sell on-the-road. If not for that, Mark would not have money — and that goes for other speakers/performers on their tour as well.”

When asked for a response to this new information regarding Williams, Sal Russo of OCDB-PAC said, “Mark is a radio talk show host and has a huge following… Each of our speakers, members, etc. have their own individual opinions and are free to express them.” Russo also referred to himself as “the ultimate decision maker on staff” at OCDB-PAC, in case there was any doubt about who's responsible for Williams still having a job.

When asked to comment on allegations made here, Williams replied, “Everything you want to know and more is in my book.”

Tea for Angela by Three Peanuts

April 27, 2010

Fitness

Filed under: Pilates — Tags: — richardkemp1980 @ 8:59 am

Fitness Chic by Teresa Malara, Fashion Photographer

  • Signs of dark matter may point to mirror matter candidate

    Physics / General Physics

    7 minutes ago |
    not rated yet |
    0
    |

    (PhysOrg.com) — Dark matter, which contains the “missing mass” that's needed to explain why galaxies stay together, could take any number of forms. The main possible candidates include MACHOS and WIMPS, but there is no shortage …

  • Graphene Outperforms Carbon Nanotubes for Creating Stronger, More Crack-Resistant Materials

    Nanotechnology / Nanomaterials

    11 hours ago |
    4.8 / 5 (13) |
    1
    |

    (PhysOrg.com) — Three new studies from researchers at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute illustrate why graphene should be the nanomaterial of choice to strengthen composite materials used in everything from …

  • Physicists capture first images of atomic spin

    Nanotechnology / Nanophysics

    13 hours ago |
    4.9 / 5 (21) |
    3
    |

    (PhysOrg.com) — Though scientists argue that the emerging technology of spintronics may trump conventional electronics for building the next generation of faster, smaller, more efficient computers and high-tech …

  • Researchers Discover How to Move Protons, Improve Hydrogen Fuel Cell Technology

    Chemistry / Materials Science

    13 hours ago |
    4.6 / 5 (10) |
    1
    |

    (PhysOrg.com) — In a breakthrough that should help to solve one of the biggest problems holding back development of affordable fuel cells, a team of University of Massachusetts Amherst scientists has discovered …

  • Scientists get bird's-eye view of how cuckoos fool their hosts (w/ Video)

    Biology / Plants & Animals

    13 hours ago |
    5 / 5 (3) |
    0
    |

    Using field experiments in Africa and a new computer model that gives them a bird's eye view of the world, Cambridge scientists have discovered how a bird decides whether or not a cuckoo has laid an egg in …

  • A Robot Called WANDA (w/ Video)

    Nanotechnology / Nanomaterials

    8 hours ago |
    5 / 5 (7) |
    0
    |

    (PhysOrg.com) — Berkeley Lab scientists have established a revolutionary nanocrystal-making robot, capable of producing nanocrystals with staggering precision. This one-of-a-kind robot, named WANDA, provides …

  • Rare 95 million-year-old flying reptile Aetodactylus halli is new genus, species of pterosaur

    Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

    8 hours ago |
    5 / 5 (4) |
    0
    |

    (PhysOrg.com) — A 95 million-year-old fossilized jaw discovered in Texas has been identified as a new genus and species of flying reptile, Aetodactylus halli.

  • The Molecular Mechanics of Hearing and Deafness (w/ Video)

    Chemistry / Biochemistry

    9 hours ago |
    not rated yet |
    0
    |

    (PhysOrg.com) — Our senses are essential for survival and for the exploration of natural environments, and much has been learned about the molecular basis of vision, olfaction, and taste. Yet only a few of …

  • Novel nanoparticles prevent radiation damage (w/ Video)

    Nanotechnology / Bio & Medicine

    10 hours ago |
    5 / 5 (2) |
    0
    |

    Tiny, melanin-covered nanoparticles may protect bone marrow from the harmful effects of radiation therapy, according to scientists at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University who successfully tested the strategy …

  • New monitor lizard discovered in Indonesia

    Biology / Plants & Animals

    10 hours ago |
    5 / 5 (3) |
    0
    |

    A newly discovered species of monitor lizard, a close relative of the Komodo dragon, was reported in the journal Zootaxa this week by a professor at UC Santa Barbara and a researcher from Finland.

WASHINGTON STATE HEADLINE NEWS

Barnyard Brothel
Skeletor McGillicutty
20 and 30 somethings are puzzies. State Patrol is ‘over the hill gang’.

WASHINGTON STATE IS SCREWED.

This state has been liberal (progressive) since, well, forever. I think Dan Evens, back in, what, 80 something was the last repub. governor they had here. At least it isn’t as foul as California. Yet.

This was the state where dimocrats figured out how to steal elections. The 2000 presidential election gave them the idea, then in 2004, Dino Rossi (R) beats Christine Gregoire for gov. but it’s close enough for a recount. And another. And another. After three or four recounts enough vote were ‘found’ to give Chrissy the lead. OK, no more recounts.

Then , in Minnesota, senator smally beats Norm Coleman after Coleman wins a close election because enough votes were ‘found’ after just one recount. No more recounts. Notice a pattern ? They’re getting better at stealing.

 

April 25, 2010

Health and Fitness

Filed under: Leisure Centre — Tags: — richardkemp1980 @ 1:05 pm

NBC4 Health & Fitness Expo by Fred Astaire Dance Studio Columbus Northwest

The first thing that seems to disappear in the life of many new moms is “their fitness routine”. It is very easy to get caught up in the “mommy world” and put everyone else first but ourselves! For women who have toddlers and pre-school aged children at home, finding the time to work out can be quite the challenge. Not everyone has a nanny, a cousin or even a babysitter to watch the children while you get a quick workout in at the gym. However, do we really need to go to the gym all the time to get an effective workout? As a spokesperson for various fitness products , I knew all too well about the options for home workouts. However, as a former gym groupie it was very difficult for me to think about exercising at home. However, with two sets of pre-school aged twins at home, going to the gym was not an option. I was lucky to be able to brush my hair and throw a on a coat of lipgloss. Who was I kidding with my thoughts of going to the gym for an hour? What most of us don't realize is that working out at home can keep you in the loop of the fitness world!

The most rewarding element about home workouts is that you can exercise with your children. We should all be teaching our children about exercise as early as the toddler years. Believe it or not, you CAN workout with your children. You just need to be a little creative and get back to the basics.. My favorite workout with my four little ones involves creating your own obstacle course. All you need are fairy wings or superhero capes, a tambourine, hopscotch mats and hula hoops. Simple moves like skipping is great for the quads. Jumping in and out of the hula hoops tones the gluteal area or buttocks and incorporating a tambourine increases the overall aerobic intensity. Check out the video to see how you can workout with your children right in your own backyard. The best part about this workout is what your neighbors will be saying when they see you skipping around the yard in fairy wings. Stir things up in the neighborhood this Spring & give this workout a try

Public release date: 6-Apr-2010

[

| E-mail

| Share

]

Contact: Peter Krustrup
pkrustrup@ifi.ku.dk
452-615-4341
University of Copenhagen

Scientists: Soccer improves health, fitness and social abilities

Led by Professors Peter Krustrup and Jens Bangsbo from the Department of Exercise and Sports Sciences, University of Copenhagen, the 3-year project covered several intervention studies involving both men, women and children, who were divided into soccer, running and control groups. The results from the studies are so remarkable that the Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports are publishing a special edition issue entitled “Football for Health” containing 14 scientific articles from the soccer project on Tuesday 6 April 2010.

Soccer for Health

The researchers studied the physical effects of soccer training for untrained subjects aged 9 to 77 years. The conclusion was clear. Soccer provides broad-spectred health and fitness effects that are at least as pronounced as for running, and in some cases even better.

Study leader Peter Krustrup concludes “Soccer is a very popular team sport that contains positive motivational and social factors that may facilitate compliance and contribute to the maintenance of a physically active lifestyle. The studies presented have demonstrated that soccer training for two-three hours per week causes significant cardiovascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal adaptations, independent on gender, age or lack of experience with soccer”.

Professor Jens Bangsbo continues: “The effects can be maintained for a long period even with a reduced frequency of training to one to two times one hour a week. Recreational soccer, therefore, appears to be an effective type of training leading to performance improvements and significant beneficial effects to health, including a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular diseases, falls and fractures. In a number of aspects, soccer training appears to be superior to running training. Soccer training can also be used to treat hypertension and it was clearly superior to a standard treatment strategy of physician-guided traditional recommendations”.

The two researchers foresee a great perspective in using soccer as a health promoting activity: “The studies have convincingly shown that soccer training is effective to enhance fitness and the health profile for the general population. Future studies are needed to understand what is causing the beneficial effects of football, how well football can be used to improve heart health in early childhood and how other patient groups such as those with type II diabetes or cancer can benefit from playing soccer”.

Soccer creates we-stories and helps women stay active

One of the many aspects of the study was to examine the level of social capital for women gained from running and soccer. Even though both the soccer players and the runners trained in groups, there were significant differences in the way they interacted and what they considered the most important aspects of the sport they were engaging in. The runners were more focused on themselves as individuals, whereas the soccer players developed “we”-stories as they began to see themselves as a team.

From the beginning, most of the women, both soccer players and runners, thought running would be an easier form of exercise to stick to after the intervention programme was over. That turned out not to be the case:

“The most important finding was the difference in social interaction and creation of we-stories between the groups, which may impact the possibilities of long-term compliance. A year after the study, many of the soccer players continue to play soccer, some have even joined an organised soccer club. Not many from the running group have continued their training. This can very well be due to the fact that the runners focussed on their health and on getting in shape, whereas the soccer players were more committed to the activity itself, including the fun and not letting down team mates”, says Associate Professor Laila Ottesen.

Men worry less when playing soccer than when running.

Another study examined the exertion experienced during training for untrained adults and their experience of “worries” and “flow”. This study, based on 6 groups of untrained men and women, showed that all groups experienced an overall high level of flow during the intervention, which underlines that the participants felt motivated, happy and involved to the point where they forgot time and fatigue. There was no difference in the level of worry for the female soccer players and runners, but the running men seemed to worry quite a lot more than their soccer playing counterparts.

“The men that played soccer elicited lower levels of worry than during running, 2.8 vs 4.0 on a 0-6 scale, and although they are training at the same average heart rate they do not feel the exertion as strongly as during running” says Associate Professor Anne-Marie Elbe and adds: “Further research is needed to examine why men and women experience playing soccer differently but it could be that the men just have had more experience with football in earlier years than the women”.

Documentation for FIFA, Michelle Obama and others

F-MARC, the research unit of FIFA, is a central partner in the project and the research provides scientific documentation for initiatives such as FIFA's newly launched “The 11 for Health” campaign that uses soccer as an educational health tool for children in order to raise awareness and improve health in African and South American communities.

Also Michelle Obama's “Let's Move” project aiming at eliminating obesity in American children through diet and sports have recently promoted soccer as a favourable activity. The research results are also used in Europe, where the research group is directly involved in implementing the results through projects focusing on adults and children, such as “The Open Soccer Club project”, “The Soccer at Work project” and the “Intensity in Pupil School Sport project”.

Sports Confederations, Football Associations, Ministries of Culture and Health and researchers from Universities, Hospitals and Centres for Working Environment are cooperating about the implementation and scientific evaluation of those projects.

About the project:

The project has received funding from, among others, FIFA – Medical Assessment and Research Centre (F-MARC), The Danish Ministry of Culture's Sports Research Committee, United Federation of Danish Workers, TrygFonden, The Danish Football Association, Team Denmark and The Danish Sports Confederation.

 

April 4, 2010

seafood

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , — richardkemp1980 @ 9:11 am

Sourse :Seafood Salad Recipes

Serious Grape: Fish and Seafood Wine Pairings

©iStockphoto.com/Fenykepez

The March issue of Food Arts magazine arrived in my mailbox last week. It's a publication intended “for the trade,” so I always find it especially interesting to see what chefs (or in this case, sommeliers) are saying to their peers. This month, an article called “Catches & Matches” addresses the rules for pairing wine and seafood.

Or should I say, rule. Singular.

According to the article, only one rule applies: when it comes to wine pairing, it isn't the fish that matters, it's the preparation of the fish. Here are a few other highlights from the article.

  • Whimsical guideline: “White wine with white seafood, pink wine with pink seafood, and red wine with red seafood.”
  • David LeFeve, executive chef at Water Grill in Los Angeles says, “Look at the wines produced in great seafood areas—like the roses of Marseille, the wines of Portugal, Spain, Southern Italy. That's what goes with seafood.”
  • Rajat Parr, wine director for the Michael Mina restaurant group, created a wine list for the Las Vegas-based American Fish around four categories of cooking: salt-baked, wood-grilled and -smoked, cast-iron griddled, and poached in ocean water. The hardest part: pairing with the fish cooked in ocean water. He leans away from oaked/buttery wines, and toward lighter, crisper wines with more mineral and citrus, “which equalizes the minerality the ocean water brings to the fish.”
  • Parr also analyzes fish for three elements: with or without skin; oily or not oily; and intense or mild fish flavor. “Skin in particular changes the wine match,” he says. “If there's skin, the wine has to be intense.” He always opts for red wine with skin-on fish: “White wine will fade if there's skin.”

Do you have any rules for wine pairings?

About the author: Kara Newman has written about wine and spirits for such publications as Wine Enthusiast and Sommelier Journal magazines, and is the author of Spice & Ice, which explores 60 tongue-tingling cocktails.


Favorite this!  (0)

As I've moved toward more sustainable food shopping, it has become painful to shop at Trader Joe's, a privately held chain of grocery stores. The heavy packaging, in spite of all the cute branding with names like Trader Jose's, Trader Giotto's and Trader Jacques's, is a turnoff. But news this week that the company wants to buy all of its seafood from “sustainable sources” by Dec. 31, 2012, reminded me what the chain does right.

The company has long been working to offer far more organic, local, sustainable options and forgo more wasteful choices. It has led the pack in many of its merchandising decisions, such as by offering a range of shampoos and soaps free of paraben and synthetic materials long before mainstream grocery stores began to stock them.

Years ago, when I first began looking for local and sustainable meat, I found that the Trader Joe's near me in Portland, Ore., already carried Northwest-grown free-range whole chickens, switching between a few farms and sometimes offering soy-free and organic meats. And in the past several months, I've noticed from its packaging that Trader Joe's organic milk comes from nearby farms, its artisan bread is also baked locally, and it's offering a growing number of Northwest wines, complete with special little pink labels, as well as organic and biodynamic wine and beer options.

But is this latest move, like those others, a harbinger of a change that will soon creep into mainstream American and European grocery stores? Or is it, as some have suggested, a last desperate cry to heal an industry that is fast using up all its resources?

Trader Joe's new goal has attracted some skepticism from quarters that might surprise those less informed about the global seafood trade. “Is it too cynical of me to wonder how much seafood will be left by 2012?” Tara Austen Weaver, a food writer and fellow Northwest resident tweeted in response to the news. My answer, at least, is no.

A Murky Future

It's clear that far more must be done to protect our waterways. A 2009 report by the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization described the majority — 52% — of the world's fish stocks as fully exploited in 2007, meaning that catch levels were at or near maximum sustainable limits. And it described an additional 28% of stocks as overexploited, depleted or recovering from depletion. That means 80% of the world's fish stocks are declining too quickly, even under the U.N.'s somewhat permissive limits. Worse, the methods international organizations are using to limit these declines are tenuous – and sometimes nonexistent.

Despite concerted efforts by environmental organizations, the health of many of our rivers is miserable, and the health of fish populations is worse. A Department of Environmental Quality study last October found that the biological health of more than 80% of the streams in the Willamette River basin is severely compromised, for example, and other examples abound.

If you study any sort of fish deeply, you'll find a web of confusion and disagreements that nearly always comes down to the conclusion that too many fish are being caught, with too much collateral damage. Weaver, the food writer, reported one visible sign: In British Columbia, eagles have taken to eating chickens and cats because of a shortage of salmon in rivers once so thick with them that bears had only to hold their mouths open midstream in spawning season to get all they could gulp down.

And farmed seafood is no better, often destroying habitats to create underwater farms, polluting nearby waters with chemicals, low-quality feed and the occasional escaped fish that intermingle with wild ones, wreaking havoc on the ecosystem.

Education and Individual Action Needed

The least we can do, I suppose, is educate. Trader Joe's is attempting to do that with its new target. In its statement, the company says it's “working with third-party, science-based organizations to establish definitions and parameters” toward the goal of 100% sustainable seafood, with the intent to address customer concerns such as the issues of overfishing and destructive catch or production methods.

In addition to the current required labeling as to seafood's country of origin and whether it is wild or farm-raised, Trader Joe's is “in the process of enhancing our package labeling for all seafood items to include information on species' Latin names, origin and catch or production method” so that customers will have far more information than they do in mainstream grocery retailers.

The policy will encompass every sort of seafood the company sells, including fresh, frozen and canned. Trader Joe's aims “to use our purchasing power to leverage change within the seafood supply community,” according to its statement. While it may be the very least a company should do, it may also be all that Trader Joe's can do.

Nothing Cute About Extinction

It's still the task of much smaller organizations to provide consumers with even greater variety and sustainability. It may be up to consumers to decide to take themselves out of the seafood industry altogether — something many people I know have done recently, based on fear that our oceans will be bare in two, or 20, years.

Trader Joe's is clearly taking a brave stance. And so far, it has avoided stamping the initiative with its usual cute names for things — no “Trader Ming's” sea bass or “Trader Giotto's Buono” olive-cured anchovies. I think that's the right decision because this isn't a cute topic. People interested in sustainability are curious to find out how many of its current products survive on the store's shelves.

seafood grill (for 2) by Masala Cha Photography ™

April 3, 2010

poem

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — richardkemp1980 @ 12:41 pm

Sourse:Publishing A Children's Book

  • Questioning Obama's origins is a legitimate enterprise. Even by their own humble standards, the major media — including Obama's biographers — have done an impressively slack job in tracing the president's uncertain roots.
  • Obama was almost assuredly born in Hawaii. There is no evidence that puts him elsewhere. Undoing the Kenyan possibility is the high likelihood that the "marriage" between Barack Sr. and Ann Dunham was a sham.
  • Much depends on that marriage. "My parents shared not only an improbable love, they shared an abiding faith in the possibilities of this nation," said Obama, establishing the romantic narrative in his keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic National Convention. His father was from Kenya. His mother was from "a town on the other side of the world, in Kansas." 
  • To paraphrase Harry Reid, Obama was no ordinary "Negro." Said Joe Biden of Obama's background, "I mean, that's a storybook, man." Enough depends on this story that Team Obama would and has dissembled to preserve it.
  • For starters, Ann Dunham spent her formative years in Washington State, several of them in the progressive cocoon of Mercer Island. It was to Washington that she returned for a year immediately after Obama's birth, a fact missed by every Obama biography I could find.
  • Baby Barack spent most of his first year in Washington as well, another fact overlooked by the biographers.
  • There is not much storybook to a romance in which the mother leaves home immediately after her son's birth. Barack Sr.'s close friends have no memory even of a relationship between him and Dunham.
  • When Barack Sr. left Hawaii a year after Obama's birth, Ann's father Stanley was there to see him off with smiles. He would always speak well of the black man who knocked up his daughter and then abandoned wife and child — mighty unusual behavior from a father-in-law.
  • There was a marriage license from another county, Maui — a classic way to avoid local notification — and a divorce, but if there was a wedding, then no one attended it. There was no ring, no photos, no leis.
  • Ann Dunham met Barack Sr. in Russian class. (In 1960, people like Lee Harvey Oswald took Russian classes.) The possibility that the Dunhams recruited Barack Sr. to front for a less savory impregnation of Ann by a black man makes more sense than the fabled romance. Obama looks nothing like Barack Sr.
  • No, there is absolutely no reason to believe that the father was Malcolm X.
  • This brings us back to "Pop." Every mainstream reviewer I could find has argued that the subject of the poem was Obama's grandfather, Stanley Dunham. None of them asked why Obama would write a poem about his "Gramps" and title it "Pop." None addressed the questions of paternity implicit in the title and in the confrontation between son and father figure.
  • On closer examination, the poem is almost assuredly about Obama's African-American mentor, the communist Frank Marshall Davis. There are two good reasons to assert this. One is that "Pop" recites a poem that he had written. Davis was a poet. Dunham was not.
  • The second reason is that "Pop" actually appears to have been written by Davis about his own relationship with Obama.
  • A stronger case can be made for Davis's authorship than for Obama's. For one, "Pop" has a different style altogether from a silly adolescent poem called "Underground" published under Obama's name along with "Pop" in Feast. Critic Warwick Collins rightly describes "Pop" as "by far the more powerful and complex" of the two, and his is the consensus opinion.
  • For another, "Pop" closely resembles in style, language, and subject a matter a poem published by Davis in 1975 called "To A Young Man." The literary analyst who unearthed this poem — I have referred to him as "Mr. West" — has argued for Davis as "Pop" from the beginning.
  • In each of the two poems in question, the young man is the narrator. In each, the old man, the Davis character, is discussed in the third person. In the 1981 poem, the narrator calls him "Pop," in the 1975 poem "the old man." In each poem, when this older character speaks to the young man, he does so without benefit of quotation marks.
  • In "To A Young Man," the Davis character says on one occasion, "Since then I have drunk/ Hal a hundred liquid years/ Distilled Through restless coils of wisdom."
  • Note the similar flow of language in "Pop": "Pop switches channels, takes another/ Shot of Seagrams, neat, and asks/ What to do with me, a green young man."
  • As is evident in these two short samples, both poems are written in free verse and make ready use of what is called "enjambment" — that is the abrupt continuation of a sentence from one line into the next.
  • There are parallels in word choice as well as style. "Neat" means without water or ice. "Neat" and "distilled" both suggest a kind of alcoholic purity. Each of these words is emphasized by isolating it from the flow of the text.
  • Both poems are published with a seeming typo that may, in fact, be a pun.

    Valentine Poem by Micheo

April 2, 2010

writers

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — richardkemp1980 @ 6:16 pm

Material from:How To Publish A Childrens Book

In the Washington Times, Associate Editor Peter
Suderman takes on the Federal Communications Commission:

As exercises in bureaucratic hairsplitting go, it is tough to
beat the sheer audacity of Federal Communications Commission
Chairman Julius Genachowski's recent declaration, “I've been clear
repeatedly that we're not going to regulate the Internet.” In
reality, between its recently released National Broadband Plan and
proposed Net neutrality guidelines, that's exactly what the agency
is planning to do.

The FCC doesn't have clear legal authority to regulate the
Internet—in court filings, it has relied on the dubious concept of
“ancillary jurisdiction,” so it's not surprising that Mr.
Genachowski doesn't want to be seen as the No. 1 Net Nanny. And it
is telling that not even the head of the FCC wants to court the
public perception that Washington is sending bureaucrats to meddle
in the nation's communication networks. Indeed, Mr. Genachowski has
inadvertently raised the issue of his agency's fundamental value,
or lack thereof. Step back, and the real question isn't whether the
agency has the authority to regulate the Internet—it's why the FCC
has authority to regulate anything.

Read the whole thing here.

After Henry Blodget fired editor John Carney from his role as the editor of Clusterstock last week, some clearly felt that Blodget, the Business Insider cofounder and CEO, owed an explanation. Blodget and Reuters finance blogger Feliz Salmon got into a Tweet-spat, which culminated in Blodget serving up something like a master class on New Media Economics Friday evening. Blodget was direct, laying out the numbers behind running a web site. His arithmetic checks out—but that doesn't mean his math makes sense.

First of all, here's Blodget's numbers, laid out on Twitter and then slide-showed, with annotations.

• He starts with a $60,000 yearly salary for an editorial staffer, which he then prorates to $5,000 a month. (Check.)

• He introduces an ad rate of $10 CPM for the website at which that staffer works. (CPM is, yes, the rate advertisers pay for the delivery of one thousand ad views—called impressions.)

• He notes that a $10 CPM is more than most general news and gossip sites can hope for, but that a business/finance site should be able to do that or a little better. (True. Most sites can't sell all of their impressions; the rest of the inventory is filled by remnant networks–all those diet supplement and work at home ad-sellers are not contracting with each web site on which they appear. A network sells these extra impressions for a very low CPM–$4, $2 or even less–then takes a cut in neighborhood of 50% for serving the ads to their network members. When figuring out a site's revenue, one must first determine how much of their impression inventory they are selling for high rates and what is being filled for pennies. So if a site sells half their inventory for $10 CPM and half through a network for $1 CPM, overall their traffic is worth $5.50 CPM. A business site is probably selling directly for more than $10, perhaps considerably more so, and their network sales are on the higher end as well. Still with me? Almost through with the math!)

• Blodget then points out that benefits need to be paid. He estimates that this raises monthly compensation to about $6000. Given our nice, round and sort of invented $10 CPM number, this means the writer needs to generate about 600,000 page views a month in order to "earn" his salary. (Check. Thus concludes the multiplication and division!)

• But writers are not all one needs for a site! What about editors? What about designers and coders? The ad sales guys? The lawyer? Rent for an office? Also, according to Blodget, "food." (Yeah, I don't know either.) But coffee machines and editors, as similar as they are, do not produce content, at least not in the way that writers do. You just can't sell ads on the labor of office furniture. So in Blodget's econ class, the writers are responsible for them as well. Those 600,000 monthly page views a writer has to pull down are now 1.8 million. (OK, one little additional bit of math: that's from Blodget saying that two-thirds of his costs go to things other than writers.) And but wait, there's more! In some cases—including, apparently, Blodget's—there are even more website costs: investors expect to earn on their investment.

Felix Salmon responded at length via his Reuters blog; no lesser authorities than Gawker Media owner Nick Denton and professional blog business person Elizabeth Spiers suggest that he doesn't understand running a web business. Denton asks Salmon to "stop pretending expertise. It's becoming embarrassing." Spiers says, "Blodget sounds like someone who runs/has run a new media business before and Felix sounds like someone who’s never been anywhere near the business side."

Salmon's surprise at the disparity between Business Insider's rate card and the monetization rates Blodget discussed reveals him to be unfamiliar with basic ad sales practices. ("ALL sites discount from rate card," Denton snapped at Salmon, meaning that a $10 CPM might often look like a $7 or $8—or a $4.) To oversimplify grossly–which he will, to be fair, hate–Salmon argues that Carney is a loss leader.

Think of Carney like a Black Friday flat panel television. (This my own ugly analogy, not Salmon's.) Business Insider loses a little on Carney in the hopes that they will make their money back on the stuff that is cheap to produce: slide shows, lists, pics of hotties kissing. Salmon says, with not a little derision, that serious people–like Salmon himself–will turn out for deeply researched original reporting, and that, furthermore, without the serious people, the ad rates will plummet. ("he key is to maintain a high-value, high-reputation brand, which readers are proud to be associated with.")

So Salmon believes that even if John Carney isn't directly earning back his salary–his stories don't create enough ad inventory to support what he is paid–his work buoys the prices of ads across the board by bringing in a high quality audience and protecting the reputation of the brand.

Salmon wants making money to square with good (or at least smart) editorial practices. I think many of us would like that to be the case. It justifies our tastes, and flatters us as writers and readers because it casts us as desirable for being smart and savvy. Is it really the case? It is probably a lot naive, though, to believe that the ad market will move away from Business Insider—which is, after all, going to draw the business audience that advertisers want, whether the readers are "smart" or "stupid"—any time soon as the result of any particular personnel move. And it's a little overly simple to believe that one personnel move reveals very much about long term trends at the site. It is easy to see why Salmon would want this to be the case, though. Carney is, in Spiers's words, a "smart and agile writer." Good writers want their readership to "be less stupid." Perhaps advertisers have a vested interest in the reverse?

A few years ago in the comments on Business Insider Henry Blodget made the case for star writers thusly: "Gawker, et al, will soon start adding a lot of star reporters from trad media who see the light. This will bring more traffic, breaking news, and credibility. The staff will grow (as will costs), but the growth in traffic should help offset." So it seems that he at one time agreed that high quality writing and reporting drive revenue, but that he's long believed in traffic as a bottom line.

Returning to that fifth bullet point, where Blodget says that roughly two thirds of his costs go to things besides editorial. It strikes me that there is no longer very much that can be considered a fixed cost in publishing, and that there are other ways to push the curve around beyond driving more traffic. Even if better editorial doesn't push CPMs up, better ad sales might. More to the point, lower costs could allow you to make different editorial decisions. Once you open the Pandora's Box of looking at a writer as someone who does or doesn't justify his expense, doesn't every outlay become the same? Would cheaper offices decrease page views? Would a WordPress installation underperform a custom-built content management system, and if so by how much? Did that expensed lunch add 10,000 pageviews of value? Maybe Blodget could nearshore the whole operation to Boise and save!

I don't know that these specific suggestions make sense for his enterprise–although Boise would probably appreciate a top-tier financial publication with the city limits; heck, they'd probably throw in tax breaks worth at least 200,000 pageviews a month–but I am certain that he should be rethinking everything about how a media business is run. If Blodget is for metrics and accountability, every expense should be held up and examined; if two-thirds of his costs are not related to editorial, as he suggests, then editorial should not bear one-hundred percent of the responsibility for the bottom line.

Christopher Conklin actually has worked in internet advertising, so don't all yell at him at once.

BUFFALO LATHAM - Beat Writer by Mark Berry - Photographer & Graphic Designer

March 17, 2010

restaurants

Filed under: Uncategorized — richardkemp1980 @ 8:49 am

Sourse:Greek Salad Recipe

The city’s Board of Health voted Tuesday morning to rate cleanliness in the city’s 25,648 food-service establishments with publicly posted letter grades, adopting a controversial plan proposed 14 months ago by the city’s Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Ratings were previously available only at the department or online. Starting in July, restaurants will have to display color-coded 8-by-10-inch placards showing their most recent grade. See the full article on Diner’s Journal.

This, from the genius who brought you the proposed salt ban:

"Assemblyman Felix W. Ortiz (Brooklyn), will soon be introducing legislation that will call on the State Comptroller to cease investments in corporations that design, manufacture, and sell provocative children’s clothing. The Assemblyman has been approached by parents, advocacy groups, and individuals concerned about the lack of modest youth and teen or “juniors” clothing on the market. In light of Fashion Week in New York City this month, Ortiz feels that now is the time to act."

And then this:

"Assemblyman Felix W. Ortiz (Brooklyn), will hold a press conference to unveil his legislation (A.9761), which would ban the advertisement of alcoholic beverages during sporting events, during daytime and certain evening hours."
(nysa.us)

Kalinka Restaurant - Montreal by appaIoosa

March 13, 2010

recipes

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , — richardkemp1980 @ 1:02 am

Sourse:Seafood Salad Recipe

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — Revamped pizza and a frank advertising campaign helped Domino's Pizza Inc. more than double its fourth-quarter profit as curious customers tried out its new recipe, the delivery chain said Tuesday.

Executives have said that the chain decided to start overhauling its recipes more than 18 months ago after mounting criticism from focus groups and on social media sites. And it boldly admitted in a series of documentary-style spots that under its old recipe, customers complained its crust tasted like cardboard and its sauce was reminiscent of ketchup.

The company began promoting its new pie, which has a new sauce and cheese combination and herb- and garlic-flavored crust, in December. That helped the company's profit climb to $23.6 million, or 41 cents per share, for the three months that ended Jan. 3.

Domino's earned $11 million, or 19 cents per share, a year earlier.

Removing one-time items, the company's profit was 30 cents per share – well ahead of forecasts.

Sales for the period improved to $462.9 million from $428.2 million. Analysts expected a profit of 25 cents per share with sales of $437.5 million.

In the U.S., sales at stores open at least a year grew 1.4 percent on higher traffic, while overseas – which comprises nearly half of global retail sales – climbed 3.9 percent.

This sales figure is a key measure of a retailer's performance since it measures results at existing stores rather than newly opened ones.

Meanwhile, Chairman and CEO David Brandon said traffic increased all of last year and has continued to grow in 2010.

This post is part of Mashable’s Spark of Genius series, which highlights a unique feature of startups. If you would like to have your startup considered for inclusion, please see the details here. The series is made possible by Microsoft BizSpark.

Name: ZipList

Quick Pitch: ZipList is a free online shopping list and recipe service that makes it easy to share and add ingredients with one click.

Genius Idea: ZipList gives you the tools to create, store and share a family grocery shopping list on the web. The list can be accessed by almost any device with a web browser, or you can share it in an e-mail or SMS text message. Of course, you can also print out an old-fashioned paper list if you prefer that.

The web-based shopping list interface lets you specify which store an item is available at — you can even specify the aisle. There’s also an option to add notes about coupons or anything else that’s pertinent to whichever household member goes to the store to pick the groceries up.

ZipList hosts a recipe database with hundreds of thousands of dishes thanks to an integration partnership with Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia at MarthaStewart.com. You can pull a recipe out of the database, identify it as one you plan to make, and add the items to your virtual shopping list.

If you want to pull a recipe from somewhere else on the web, ZipList provides a Recipe Clipper bookmarklet that lets you do exactly that. Again, ingredients for the recipe will be added to your shopping list.

The ZipList website is free and ad-supported. ZipList also powers Martha Stewart’s Everyday Food: Fresh & Easy Recipes iPhone app [iTunes link], which costs $0.99.

Sponsored by Microsoft BizSpark

BizSpark is a startup program that gives you three-year access to the latest Microsoft development tools, as well as connecting you to a nationwide network of investors and incubators. There are no upfront costs, so if your business is privately owned, less than three years old, and generates less than U.S.$1 million in annual revenue, you can sign up today.

Entrepreneurs can take advantage of the Azure Services platform for their website hosting and storage needs. Microsoft recently announced the “new CloudApp()” contest – use the Azure Services Platform for hosting your .NET or PHPPHP app, and you could be the lucky winner of a USD 5000* (please see website for official rules and guidelines).”

recipe book open by ionracas

March 12, 2010

muscle relaxer

Filed under: Uncategorized — richardkemp1980 @ 1:17 am

Otc Muscle Relaxer

The following is from TMZ.com.

WWE Superstar Death—Vicodin and Valium

Former WWE Superstar Eddie Fatu aka Umaga —who died in December—was the victim of a bad combination of drugs, according to the Harris County Medical Examiner in Texas.

Dan Morgan, the supervisory forensic investigator for Harris County, blamed “acute toxicity”—claiming the combined effects of hydrocodone (aka Vicodin), carisoprodol (muscle relaxer), and diazepam (aka Valium) were responsible for the wrestler's death.

The death was ruled “accidental”—Fatu was 36.

According to the WWE, Fatu was released from his wrestling contract on June 11 for violating the WWE Wellness Program and for refusing to go to rehab.

Read more: http://www.tmz.com/#ixzz0gxWp1pgQ

Credit: TMZ.com

Over the last few days we have been hearing numerous stories about Gregory “Hurricane” Helms. As most have heard by now, both he and Chris Jericho were arrested a few days ago.

But why was Jericho allowed to compete at the Royal Rumble and Helms was pulled?

The reason is completely simple, Jericho wasn't the man who caused any issues. In fact, the police were called for Helms and his reckless behavior, and because Jericho stuck around (unlike Matt Hardy who was with both Helms and Jericho but ran when police arrived) he was arrested for being intoxicated in public.

Kinda reminds me of what a comedian said. “I was thrown out in public while being in a bar, I was caught by police and they wanted to arrest me for being drunk in public, I wasn't drunk in public, I was drunk in a bar. They threw me out in public.”

They both were apparently play wrestling and Jericho got hit, which is where the black eye you saw him sporting at The Royal Rumble came from. Helms was said to have done that, and allegedly struck a woman.

Helms and Jericho were arrested and then bailed out soon after, but the story doesn't stop there.

At the time of the arrest, Helms had what police said was ”one white round pill.” Now, some could think this was claritan or something along those lines at first glance unless they were a pharmacist or another type of drug professional.

So the police asked Helms about it, and Helms told them it was Soma. The pill is a generic version of the muscle relaxer Carisoprodol and a schedule four narcotic. Many who have used it said it is a very good, I've never tried it so I'm going by online reports here.

Now Helms claimed that he had a prescription for it, but he was unable to prove it at the time of the arrest.

The police did not charge Helms for the single pill, but should he be unable to provide a prescription he will be in violation of the WWE Wellness Policy and Kentucky state law. I am not sure on what their policy is for possession of one Soma pill though.

A lot of wrestlers use pain killers or muscle relaxers, and many in places such as the WWE or TNA have prescriptions for them. There are times in which they do not, where they have some that have a prescription yet have others without one.

But it's mostly Indy wrestlers that don't have prescriptions for drugs nowadays.

In any case, Helms may be out the door quite soon.

And this was before the arrest by the way. According to my sources, Helms met with the WWE legal department early last month about a release from World Wrestling Entertainment.

It was believed that if he was going to be leaving the WWE, it would be after the Royal Rumble at some point.

Helms has a veteran's policy in his contract, which means his no compete clause when released is about 45 days, instead of the normal 90 most wrestlers see upon their release from the WWE.

If he is released from the WWE, it could be at some point this month. It's unlikely the WWE would use him at WrestleMania, and there is no storyline for him going into the Elimination Chamber PPV either.

So with that being said, Helms could be gone very soon. Especially with all the legal trouble he has been in.

While many would think that he is being released for the legal trouble, we should keep in mind that he allegedly asked for the release.

I say stay glued to WWE.com to see if he is gone. But for now this is all the news on Helms I can find and what I've heard from a few sources.

 

partial source for arrest news: TMZ

throwing_muscle_relaxers_diptych by lastsummergirl

March 5, 2010

fish

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , — richardkemp1980 @ 12:56 am

Sourse:Seafood Salad Recipe

Nearly one year ago, I wrote about how McDonald’s Big Mouth Billy Bass-inspired Filet-O-Fish commercial had the ability to crawl inside my brain, refuse to exit, and — through the power of hypnosis — force me to do anything that singing fish required of me. (Basically, he was my version of this.)

But just as I was beginning to regain control of my mind 11 months later — and formed the ability to resist the urge to swallow one of those terrifyingly square fried fish patties — the fish is back! For pure nostalgia’s sake, McDonald’s Filet-O-Fish 2.0 makes me happy, but now I resist picking up my phone whenever it vibrates, in fear that Billy will brainwash me into investing all my cash in McDonald’s or outdated products from the 1990s. I am getting sleepy…so sleepy…Help! Get him out of my head — again!

Salmon. You put it on the bbq in the summer, you treat yourself to it at your local sushi joint in the winter, and if you're lucky enough you keep a stash of it on hand for Sunday morning bagels and cream cheese. But salmon is a whole lot more than food; it's an iconic species that is a key link in the chain between environment, recreation, jobs and the economy.

For the last 15 years, federal agencies have continued to put politics before science, circumventing the Endangered Species Act and pushing Columbia-Snake River salmon to the brink of extinction and hurting salmon communities across the Pacific Coast.

The plan in question is called a Biological Opinion (BiOp) and it was originally submitted to the court by the Bush Administration. Rather than toss it out, the Obama team made some additions, known as an Adaptive Management Implementation Plan. The State of Oregon, salmon advocates and the Nez Perce tribe of Idaho are suing the agencies, saying the plan doesn't do enough to protect endangered salmon from the harmful impact of dams in the region, and that removal of the four lower Snake River dams in Eastern Washington must be on the table to recover imperiled fish.

Independent scientists agree. Last week the Western Division of the American Fisheries Society (WDAFS) released a scientific review of the Obama administration's proposed additions to the federal salmon plan for the Columbia-Snake River Basin.

The society's assessment concludes that the addendum, issued by NOAA Fisheries last September and known as the Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP), is not aggressive, rigorous, or specific enough to help bolster imperiled runs of wild salmon and steelhead.

“With this review, the independent scientists of the American Fisheries Society have shed some much-needed light on a topic that has already generated quite a bit of heat,” said Jim Martin, former chief of fisheries for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. “These experts looked at the AMIP and asked two all-important questions: does it do enough to help struggling salmon, and does it utilize the best science? Unfortunately, the answer to both questions appears to be no.”

The American Fisheries Society is the world's largest and oldest organization of fisheries professionals; its 3,500-member Western Division covers the 13 Western states and British Columbia, including the entire Columbia Basin.

From the Public News Service:

Leanne Roulson, WDAFS president, says if fish numbers continue to decline, her group has determined the plan isn't aggressive enough to save them.

“We're all about preserving and conserving the fisheries resource, while the political aspects of it are not really relevant to the stances we take or the opinions we put out there.”

Ed Bowles, chief of fisheries for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, agrees:

“The State of Oregon's concern is that, just including the Adaptive Management Implementation Plan into the BiOp does not even come close to fixing the fatal flaws of the BiOp.”

Bowles says recent predictions of the biggest salmon runs in years are mostly hatchery fish, and the wild fish remain on the endangered list.

The Obama administration announced last week that it will, in fact, revise its plan for recovering Columbia River salmon, accepting U.S. District Judge James A. Redden's offer of a voluntary three-month remand, in which he specified that NOAA is obligated by the Endangered Species act to use the best available science.

From Judge Redden's letter:

I will not sign an order of voluntary remand that effectively relieves federal defendants of their obligation to use the best available science and consider all important aspects of the problem. This court will not dictate the scope or substance of federal defendants' remand, but federal defendants must comply with the [Endangered Species Act] in preparing any amended/supplemental biological opinion.

A coalition of conservation and fishing groups agrees. “The first order of business with the Endangered Species Act is to use the best science,” said Nicole Cordan, policy and legal director for the Save Our Wild Salmon Coalition.

Between WDAFS's review and last week's court decision, the Obama Administration now has one last chance to hit the reset button on salmon; we hope they'll take this opportunity to truly fix their plan, and do so in a transparent, open way, using sound science that incorporates the work of WDAFS and other federal salmon biologists such as the experts at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

With true recovery of wild salmon and steelhead in question, fishing and river communities have been left to bear the brunt with unprecedented closures and restrictions from Southeast Alaska to Monterey Bay, California.

“We've said it before and we'll say it again: following the science is the only path to a successful, legal salmon plan, and it's also the best way to restore our struggling fishing communities,” said Liz Hamilton, executive director of the Northwest Sportfishing Industry Association.

A thoughtful, science-based plan will allow for the rebuilding of recreational and commercial fishing jobs, while also protecting other stakeholders throughout the Basin. It's science, but it's not rocket science; we can do this, provided we put salmon biology in the driver's seat where it belongs.

With yet another for the Obama administration to revamp its plan, the question is: will the revised version be enough to save these fish from extinction?

.....Gone Fishing! by Imapix

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress